Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is the Czech Republic's smallest building savings bank. In 2012, the bank held a 10.5% share of building savings loans and 8.7% of deposits. Partly because of its small size (and limited economies of scale and synergies with a would-be commercial bank on the Czech market) and its conservative approach (the bank has the best loan quality and provision coverage), the bank is traditionally the
Read more »Buy all financials of Wustenrot Stavebni Sporitelna
from $199 /monthBuy annual subscriptions for all our products.
summary | Unit |
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
Net Interest Income | CZK mil |
Total Revenues | CZK mil |
Operating Profit | CZK mil |
Net Profit | CZK mil |
737 | 604 | 511 | 599 | 632 | ||||||||||||||
1,140 | 873 | 668 | 730 | 958 | ||||||||||||||
611 | 377 | 191 | 198 | 377 | ||||||||||||||
251 | 267 | 90.0 | 93.0 | 215 |
Interbank Loans | CZK mil |
Customer Loans | CZK mil |
Debt Securities | CZK mil |
Total Assets | CZK mil |
Shareholders' Equity | CZK mil |
Interbank Borrowing | CZK mil |
Customer Deposits | CZK mil |
Issued Debt Securities | CZK mil |
118 | 1,604 | 2,769 | 1,922 | 527 | ||||||||||||||
30,235 | 25,850 | 23,735 | 22,467 | 21,358 | ||||||||||||||
7,810 | 7,456 | 10,756 | 10,101 | 11,070 | ||||||||||||||
42,715 | 43,016 | 41,413 | 36,904 | 37,332 | ||||||||||||||
2,667 | 2,956 | 3,113 | 3,245 | 3,435 | ||||||||||||||
9.53 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 0 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||||
38,393 | 39,602 | 37,834 | 33,333 | 33,527 | ||||||||||||||
105 | 106 | 106 | 0 | 0 |
9.87% | 9.50% | 2.97% | 2.93% | 6.44% | ||||||||||||||
0.602% | 0.623% | 0.213% | 0.237% | 0.579% | ||||||||||||||
1.27% | 1.16% | 1.13% | 1.36% | 1.57% | ||||||||||||||
46.4% | 56.8% | 71.4% | 72.9% | 60.6% | ||||||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | 11.9% | 14.4% | 15.7% | 18.1% | 19.0% | ||||||||||
1.77% | 1.41% | 1.21% | 1.53% | 1.70% | ||||||||||||||
64.7% | 69.2% | 76.5% | 82.1% | 66.0% | ||||||||||||||
17.3% | 29.1% | 21.0% | 15.5% | 13.0% | ||||||||||||||
33.9% | 38.3% | 36.1% | 34.4% | 40.4% | ||||||||||||||
6.24% | 6.87% | 7.52% | 8.79% | 9.20% | ||||||||||||||
78.8% | 65.3% | 62.7% | 67.4% | 63.7% | ||||||||||||||
70.8% | 60.1% | 57.3% | 60.9% | 57.2% | ||||||||||||||
2.04% | 2.61% | 3.16% | 3.29% | 3.65% | ||||||||||||||
67.8% | 69.2% | 70.2% | 76.7% | 85.0% |
income statement | Unit |
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
Interest Income | CZK mil |
Interest Cost | CZK mil |
Net Interest Income | CZK mil |
Net Fee Income | CZK mil |
Other Income | CZK mil |
Total Revenues | CZK mil |
Staff Cost | CZK mil |
Depreciation | CZK mil |
Other Cost | CZK mil |
Operating Cost | CZK mil |
Operating Profit | CZK mil |
Provisions | CZK mil |
Extra and Other Cost | CZK mil |
Pre-Tax Profit | CZK mil |
Tax | CZK mil |
Minorities | CZK mil |
Net Profit | CZK mil |
Dividends | CZK mil |
1,805 | 1,612 | 1,474 | 1,389 | 1,323 | ||||||||||||||
1,067 | 1,008 | 963 | 790 | 691 | ||||||||||||||
737 | 604 | 511 | 599 | 632 | ||||||||||||||
198 | 254 | 140 | 113 | 125 | ||||||||||||||
205 | 15.0 | 17.0 | 18.0 | 201 | ||||||||||||||
1,140 | 873 | 668 | 730 | 958 | ||||||||||||||
179 | 190 | 172 | 183 | 235 | ||||||||||||||
55.4 | 55.0 | 54.0 | 89.0 | 66.0 | ||||||||||||||
294 | 251 | 251 | 260 | 280 | ||||||||||||||
529 | 496 | 477 | 532 | 581 | ||||||||||||||
611 | 377 | 191 | 198 | 377 | ||||||||||||||
1.94 | 47.0 | 77.0 | 81.0 | 109 | ||||||||||||||
242 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
367 | 330 | 114 | 117 | 268 | ||||||||||||||
117 | 63.0 | 24.0 | 24.0 | 53.0 | ||||||||||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
251 | 267 | 90.0 | 93.0 | 215 | ||||||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 215 | ... |
Net Interest Income Growth | % |
Net Fee Income Growth | % |
Total Revenue Growth | % |
Operating Cost Growth | % |
Operating Profit Growth | % |
Pre-Tax Profit Growth | % |
Net Profit Growth | % |
... | -1.20% | -18.1% | -15.4% | 17.2% | 5.51% | |||||||||||||
... | 25.3% | 28.5% | -44.9% | -19.3% | 10.6% | |||||||||||||
... | 30.2% | -23.4% | -23.5% | 9.28% | 31.2% | |||||||||||||
... | 5.59% | -6.19% | -3.83% | 11.5% | 9.21% | |||||||||||||
... | 63.2% | -38.3% | -49.3% | 3.66% | 90.4% | |||||||||||||
... | 16.9% | -10.2% | -65.5% | 2.63% | 129% | |||||||||||||
... | 2.28% | 6.56% | -66.3% | 3.33% | 131% |
Market Share in Revenues | % |
Market Share in Net Profit | % |
Market Share in Employees | % |
Market Share in Branches | % |
0.682% | 0.519% | 0.398% | 0.419% | 0.532% | ||||||||||||||
0.390% | 0.437% | 0.143% | 0.140% | 0.292% | ||||||||||||||
0.834% | 0.810% | 0.788% | 0.586% | 0.600% | ||||||||||||||
0.048% | 0.045% | 0.045% | 0.046% | 0.049% |
balance sheet | Unit |
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
Cash | CZK mil |
Interbank Loans | CZK mil |
Customer Loans | CZK mil |
Retail Loans | CZK mil |
Mortgage Loans | CZK mil |
Consumer Loans | CZK mil |
Corporate Loans | CZK mil |
Debt Securities | CZK mil |
Fixed Assets | CZK mil |
Total Assets | CZK mil |
Shareholders' Equity | CZK mil |
Of Which Minority Interest | CZK mil |
Liabilities | CZK mil |
Interbank Borrowing | CZK mil |
Customer Deposits | CZK mil |
Retail Deposits | CZK mil |
Corporate Deposits | CZK mil |
Issued Debt Securities | CZK mil |
Other Liabilities | CZK mil |
2,814 | 3,233 | 3,328 | 1,753 | 3,680 | ||||||||||||||
118 | 1,604 | 2,769 | 1,922 | 527 | ||||||||||||||
30,235 | 25,850 | 23,735 | 22,467 | 21,358 | ||||||||||||||
30,235 | 25,850 | 20,694 | 19,849 | 19,200 | ||||||||||||||
30,235 | 25,850 | 20,694 | 19,849 | 19,200 | ||||||||||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
0 | 0 | 2,992 | 2,566 | 2,127 | ||||||||||||||
7,810 | 7,456 | 10,756 | 10,101 | 11,070 | ||||||||||||||
120 | 238 | 245 | 208 | 225 | ||||||||||||||
42,715 | 43,016 | 41,413 | 36,904 | 37,332 | ||||||||||||||
2,667 | 2,956 | 3,113 | 3,245 | 3,435 | ||||||||||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
40,048 | 40,060 | 38,300 | 33,659 | 33,897 | ||||||||||||||
9.53 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 0 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||||
38,393 | 39,602 | 37,834 | 33,333 | 33,527 | ||||||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | 38,393 | 39,602 | 36,495 | 32,100 | 32,079 | ||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | 0 | 0 | 773 | 653 | 600 | ||||||||||
105 | 106 | 106 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
1,540 | 341 | 349 | 326 | 360 |
Non-Performing Loans | CZK mil |
Gross Loans | CZK mil |
Total Provisions | CZK mil |
626 | 686 | 768 | 759 | 804 | ||||||||||||||
30,659 | 26,325 | 24,274 | 23,049 | 22,041 | ||||||||||||||
424 | 475 | 539 | 582 | 683 |
... | -7.95% | -14.5% | -8.18% | -5.34% | -4.94% | |||||||||||||
... | -7.95% | -14.5% | -19.9% | -4.08% | -3.27% | |||||||||||||
... | -7.95% | -14.5% | -19.9% | -4.08% | -3.27% | |||||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | -14.2% | -17.1% | ||
... | 5.29% | 0.705% | -3.73% | -10.9% | 1.16% | |||||||||||||
... | 10.6% | 10.8% | 5.31% | 4.24% | 5.86% | |||||||||||||
... | 3.94% | 3.15% | -4.46% | -11.9% | 0.582% | |||||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 3.94% | 3.15% | -7.85% | -12.0% | -0.067% | |||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | -15.5% | -8.14% |
1.28% | 1.03% | 0.901% | 0.807% | 0.724% | ||||||||||||||
0% | 0% | 0.342% | 0.279% | 0.218% | ||||||||||||||
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||||||||||
2.66% | 2.19% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.35% | ||||||||||||||
3.73% | 3.03% | 2.30% | 2.04% | 1.82% | ||||||||||||||
0.922% | 0.827% | 0.769% | 0.665% | 0.620% | ||||||||||||||
1.23% | 1.19% | 1.10% | 0.947% | 0.890% | ||||||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | 2.17% | 2.19% | 1.90% | 1.58% | 1.45% | ||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | 0% | 0% | 0.092% | 0.071% | 0.065% |
ratios | Unit |
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
9.87% | 9.50% | 2.97% | 2.93% | 6.44% | ||||||||||||||
0.602% | 0.623% | 0.213% | 0.237% | 0.579% | ||||||||||||||
1.27% | 1.16% | 1.13% | 1.36% | 1.57% | ||||||||||||||
46.4% | 56.8% | 71.4% | 72.9% | 60.6% | ||||||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | 11.9% | 14.4% | 15.7% | 18.1% | 19.0% | ||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 15.7% | 18.1% | 19.0% | ||
1.77% | 1.41% | 1.21% | 1.53% | 1.70% | ||||||||||||||
... | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.03% | 1.35% | 1.52% | |||||||||||||
4.33% | 3.76% | 3.49% | 3.55% | 3.56% | ||||||||||||||
... | 2.73% | 2.52% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 2.05% | |||||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | ... | ||
64.7% | 69.2% | 76.5% | 82.1% | 66.0% | ||||||||||||||
17.3% | 29.1% | 21.0% | 15.5% | 13.0% | ||||||||||||||
18.0% | 1.72% | 2.54% | 2.47% | 21.0% | ||||||||||||||
2,273 | 2,482 | 2,109 | 2,649 | 3,155 | ||||||||||||||
44,453 | 48,569 | 45,073 | 63,225 | 79,607 | ||||||||||||||
33.9% | 38.3% | 36.1% | 34.4% | 40.4% | ||||||||||||||
6.24% | 6.87% | 7.52% | 8.79% | 9.20% | ||||||||||||||
78.8% | 65.3% | 62.7% | 67.4% | 63.7% | ||||||||||||||
70.8% | 60.1% | 57.3% | 60.9% | 57.2% | ||||||||||||||
2.04% | 2.61% | 3.16% | 3.29% | 3.65% | ||||||||||||||
67.8% | 69.2% | 70.2% | 76.7% | 85.0% | ||||||||||||||
1.40% | 1.84% | 2.27% | 2.59% | 3.20% | ||||||||||||||
0.006% | 0.168% | 0.311% | 0.351% | 0.497% |
other data | Unit |
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
Branches | |
Employees | |
Number Of Loan Contracts | '000 |
Sale Of New Loan Contracts | '000 |
Number Of Deposit Contracts | '000 |
Sale Of New Deposit Contracts | '000 |
Number Of All Contracts | '000 |
Size Of Average Loan | CZK mil |
Size Of Average Deposit | CZK mil |
1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
336 | 326 | 318 | 241 | 246 | ||||||||||||||
71.7 | 63.7 | 57.7 | 55.1 | 53.7 | ||||||||||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ||||||||||
467 | 459 | 438 | 405 | 393 | ||||||||||||||
... | ... | 62.1 | 56.2 | 56.9 | 31.9 | 36.5 | ||||||||||||
538 | 523 | 495 | 437 | 429 | ||||||||||||||
0.422 | 0.406 | 0.411 | 0.408 | 0.398 | ||||||||||||||
0.082 | 0.086 | 0.086 | 0.082 | 0.085 |
This Quarterly statistical dossier offers a summary of Wustenrot Stavebni Sporitelna's performance between Dec 00 and Jun 19 on an quarterly basis. The report can be downloaded as an excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the bank's balance sheet and income statement and the main ratios related to the bank's business such as
Read more »This Quarterly statistical dossier offers a summary of Wustenrot Stavebni Sporitelna's performance between Dec 00 and Jun 19 on an quarterly basis. The report can be downloaded as an excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the bank's balance sheet and income statement and the main ratios related to the bank's business such as asset quality, capital ratios, number and cost of employees or a detailed breakdown of some of the bank's business such as its loan portfolio.
In addition, the excel file provides a detailed overview of the bank's market position in comparison with the overall banking sector. You can, for example, track WSS's market position in mortgage or consumer lending.
If you are only interested in particular areas of the bank's business, you can find and download specific indicators from the bank's corporate profile, or specific charts from the bank's charts section, where you can find a comparison of the bank with its peers.
If you are interested in the bank’s quarterly figures, please refer to the bank’s quarterly statistical dossier.
This Annual statistical dossier offers a summary of Wustenrot Stavebni Sporitelna's performance between 2000 and 2018 on an annual basis. The report can be downloaded as an excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the bank's balance sheet and income statement and the main ratios related to the bank's business such as asset
Read more »This Annual statistical dossier offers a summary of Wustenrot Stavebni Sporitelna's performance between 2000 and 2018 on an annual basis. The report can be downloaded as an excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the bank's balance sheet and income statement and the main ratios related to the bank's business such as asset quality, capital ratios, number and cost of employees or a detailed breakdown of some of the bank's business such as its loan portfolio.
In addition, the excel file provides a detailed overview of the bank's market position in comparison with the overall banking sector. You can, for example, track WSS's market position in mortgage or consumer lending.
If you are only interested in particular areas of the bank's business, you can find and download specific indicators from the bank's corporate profile, or specific charts from the bank's charts section, where you can find a comparison of the bank with its peers.
If you are interested in the bank’s quarterly figures, please refer to the bank’s quarterly statistical dossier.
This Quarterly Statistical Dossier offers a comparison of 22 Czech banks from Dec 96 to Sep 18 on an quarterly basis. The report can be downloaded as an Excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the banks' balance sheets such as loan and deposit breakdown, or capitalization, income statements for the sector and the main ratios related to the
Read more »This Quarterly Statistical Dossier offers a comparison of 22 Czech banks from Dec 96 to Sep 18 on an quarterly basis. The report can be downloaded as an Excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the banks' balance sheets such as loan and deposit breakdown, or capitalization, income statements for the sector and the main ratios related to the banking business such as asset quality, number and cost of employees or details on banking infrastructure.
The file contains data of following banks:
If you are only interested in particular areas of a bank's business, you can find and download specific indicators from the bank's Corporate Profile, or specific charts from the bank's Chart Section, where you can find a comparison of the bank with its peers.
Alternatively, you can find similar data for the Czech banking sector in the banking Sector Profile.
If you are interested in the banking quarterly figures, please refer to the banking Quarterly Statistical Dossier. Download a sample excel file attached to see more details. On purchase, the hidden cells will be unlocked and all available data wll be visible.
This Annual Statistical Dossier offers a comparison of 24 Czech banks from 1990 to 2017 on an annual basis. The report can be downloaded as an Excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the banks' balance sheets such as loan and deposit breakdown, or capitalization, income statements for the sector and the main ratios related to the banking
Read more »This Annual Statistical Dossier offers a comparison of 24 Czech banks from 1990 to 2017 on an annual basis. The report can be downloaded as an Excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the banks' balance sheets such as loan and deposit breakdown, or capitalization, income statements for the sector and the main ratios related to the banking business such as asset quality, number and cost of employees or details on banking infrastructure.
The file contains data of following banks:
If you are only interested in particular areas of a bank's business, you can find and download specific indicators from the bank's Corporate Profile, or specific charts from the bank's Chart Section, where you can find a comparison of the bank with its peers.
Alternatively, you can find similar data for the Czech banking sector in the banking Sector Profile.
If you are interested in the banking quarterly figures, please refer to the banking Quarterly Statistical Dossier. Download a sample excel file attached to see more details. On purchase, the hidden cells will be unlocked and all available data wll be visible.
This report analyses the main trends in the Czech banking with a special focus on the 3Q2014's performance. In the 108-page report, you will find all the necessary details regarding profitability of the sector, breakdown and trends of the volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the sector and within the particular segments of the market.
In
Read more »This report analyses the main trends in the Czech banking with a special focus on the 3Q2014's performance. In the 108-page report, you will find all the necessary details regarding profitability of the sector, breakdown and trends of the volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the sector and within the particular segments of the market.
In addition, you will find here financials and market share of the 20 banks we cover in the Czech Republic including all key ratios describing their business. The report includes 446 charts and 40 tables.
The key points are:
You might also find all banks' financials in the Company section at www.helgilibrary.com/companies, and key charts for each bank at www.helgilibrary.com/charts.
The report is free to download, just register at our webpage.
This report analyses the performance of the Bank for the 3Q2014. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the Bank.
The key highlights are:
Wüstenrot hypoteční's profit doubles...
Wüstenrot hypoteční banka
Read more »This report analyses the performance of the Bank for the 3Q2014. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the Bank.
The key highlights are:
Wüstenrot hypoteční's profit doubles...
Wüstenrot hypoteční banka reported a net profit of CZK 54.8 mil. in 3Q2014, nearly twice as much as in the same period last year.
...thanks to a fall in cost of funding
The whole profit improvement in the third quarter (and in the whole year actually) comes from the fall in the bank's cost of funding. The average cost of liabilities (deposits account for 69% of that) fell 20%, or 53 bp in the last 12 months to 2.13%.
Given the fact that average asset yield remained stable at 3.75%, the bank's net interest margin improved dramatically from 1.26% to 1.75% in the last year.
In other words, the cheaper funding brought a CZK 51 mil. improvement in the net interest income compared to a CZK 33 mil. increase in the bank's pre-tax profit in 3Q2014.
Re-pricing of the bank's assets and liabilities corresponds with the fact that Wüstenrot stopped gaining market share. It also put the bank nearly on a par with the market leader Hypoteční banka.
When comparing these two mortgage only banks on the market, two differences stand out:
• Cost efficiency
• Capital strength
Cost efficiency
Wüstenrot hypoteční banka seems to be a pretty cost efficient bank as costs account for less than 39% of income. The picture deteriorates somewhat when compared to Hypoteční banka's 17.6%.
The picture darkens even more on finding out that Wüstenrot pays its staff 2.2x more than Hypoteční banka on average.
Although the two banks cannot be compared so bluntly (Hypoteční has nearly 500 employees compared to Wüstenrot's fewer than 40, so management pay might distort the numbers heavily), it is clearly the cost side to watch at Wüstenrot.
Capital strength
Wüstenrot hypoteční banka's capital adequacy of 12.9% at the end of September 2014 is a respectable number, by all means. It's clearly a high enough figure for a bank with a ROE of nearly 14% while the market grows at 7% only.
However, the sector average accounts for 18% while Hypoteční banka's capital adequacy amounts to 34% (which is rather ridiculous).
The question is how well prepared is Wüstenrot hypoteční banka to gain market share in the future, or how to keep up with the market if demand rises fast?
You will find more details about the bank at www.helgilibrary.com/companies
This report analyses the performance of the Bank for the 3Q2014. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the Bank.
The key highlights are:
Wüstenrot Spořitelna's net profit falls 15.5%...
Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna
Read more »This report analyses the performance of the Bank for the 3Q2014. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the Bank.
The key highlights are:
Wüstenrot Spořitelna's net profit falls 15.5%...
Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna reported a net profit of CZK 33.2 mil. in 3Q2014, down 15.5% yoy compared to the same period last year. The deterioration was driven purely by a 47% yoy fall in net fee income generation. On the other hand, interest income continued to rise and operating costs and provisions fell.
As seen on the chart above, the big picture remains negative. Wüstenrot's ROE dropped below 5% so the bank remains the least profitable within the sector.
Falling loans and deposits (in absolute as well as in relative terms) do not allow the bank to create economies of scale, so cost efficiency is low. Finally, declining margins make the bank's life even more difficult.
...as fee income drops 47% yoy
The 47% drop in net fees is the most significant feature of the quarter. Although the bank's revenue might be volatile, fee income has been declining since September 2013. Unless 4Q results bring a change in the trend, one should be worried here.
Too small and losing...
Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is the smallest building savings bank with a 9.6% market share in building savings loans and 8.8% in deposits.
This is a problem as its relatively small size does not allow the bank to benefit from economies of scale such as in the case of ČMSS, the largest building savings bank with a market share of over 40%. While ČMSS operates with cost to income at below 40%, Wüstenrot could not get below 60% in 2014.
The fact that Wüstenrot's market share continues to decline is therefore further bad news for the bank.
While market share in lending has been declining since the middle of 2012, the bank lost 49 bp on the deposit side just within the last two quarters.
...but fightiing
Despite the deteriorating profitability, declining volumes and market share losses, there are some positives worth highlighting:
• Net interest margin continues to recover. It's 20 bp better than last year
• The management shows good effort on the cost side.
• The bank's asset quality remains the best within the sector
You will find more details about the bank at www.helgilibrary.com/companies
Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is the Czech Republic's smallest building savings bank. In 2012, the bank held a 10.5% share of building savings loans and 8.7% of deposits. Partly because of its small size (and limited economies of scale and synergies with a would-be commercial bank on the Czech market) and its conservative approach (the bank has
Read more »Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is the Czech Republic's smallest building savings bank. In 2012, the bank held a 10.5% share of building savings loans and 8.7% of deposits. Partly because of its small size (and limited economies of scale and synergies with a would-be commercial bank on the Czech market) and its conservative approach (the bank has the best loan quality and provision coverage), the bank is traditionally the least profitable building savings bank on the market. In 2012, the bank achieved ROE of “only” 9.7%, compared to the 15.2% of the 5-building savings banks average. Size matters and the lack of economies of scale is reflected in Wüstenrot’s low cost efficiency. In 2012, the bank’s operating costs accounted for 1.27% of average assets, nearly twice as much as the other savings banks.
This report offers a summary of the company's performance in 2000-2012. You will find here all the key numbers from the bank's balance sheet, income statement and main ratios related to the bank's business.
In addition, the report provides a detailed overview of the bank's market position in the comparison with the overall banking sector and within the business of building savings
Similarly to Wüstenrot Hypoteční banka in mortgage lending, Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is a relatively little bank, with a 10.5% share of lending and 8.7% of building savings deposits as of the end of 2012.
Partly because of its small size (and limited economies of scale and synergies with a would-be commercial bank on
Read more »Similarly to Wüstenrot Hypoteční banka in mortgage lending, Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is a relatively little bank, with a 10.5% share of lending and 8.7% of building savings deposits as of the end of 2012.
Partly because of its small size (and limited economies of scale and synergies with a would-be commercial bank on the Czech market) and its conservative approach (the bank has the best loan quality and provision coverage), the bank is traditionally the least profitable building savings bank on the market. In 2012, the bank achieved ROE of “only” 9.7%, compared to the 15.2% of the 5-building savings banks average. Size matters and the lack of economies of scale is reflected in Wüstenrot’s low cost efficiency. In 2012, the bank’s operating costs accounted for 1.27% of average assets, nearly twice as much as the other savings banks.
This excel file offers a summary of the company's performance in between 1Q2003-1Q2013, both on the quarterly as well as the annual basis. You will find here all the key numbers from the bank's balance sheet, income statement and main ratios related to the bank's business. In addition, the file provides a detailed overview of the bank's market position in the comparison with the overall banking sector as well as the segment of building societies
Similarly to Wüstenrot Hypoteční banka in mortgage lending, Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is a relatively little bank, with a 10.5% share of lending and 8.7% of building savings deposits as of the end of 2012.
Partly because of its small size (and limited economies of scale and synergies with a would-be commercial bank on
Read more »Similarly to Wüstenrot Hypoteční banka in mortgage lending, Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is a relatively little bank, with a 10.5% share of lending and 8.7% of building savings deposits as of the end of 2012.
Partly because of its small size (and limited economies of scale and synergies with a would-be commercial bank on the Czech market) and its conservative approach (the bank has the best loan quality and provision coverage), the bank is traditionally the least profitable building savings bank on the market. In 2012, the bank achieved ROE of “only” 9.7%, compared to the 15.2% of the 5-building savings banks average. Size matters and the lack of economies of scale is reflected in Wüstenrot’s low cost efficiency. In 2012, the bank’s operating costs accounted for 1.27% of average assets, nearly twice as much as the other savings banks.
This report offers a summary of the company's performance in 2008-2012. You will find here all the key numbers from the bank's balance sheet, income statement and main ratios related to the bank's business. In addition, the report provides a detailed overview of the bank's market position in the comparison wi the overall banking sector as well as with other building savings banks
This report analyses the building savings business in the Czech Republic for the 4Q2012. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the building savings (as well as mortgage lending segment). Also, the report compares profitability and efficiency ratio of the largest player CMSS with the main
Read more »This report analyses the building savings business in the Czech Republic for the 4Q2012. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the building savings (as well as mortgage lending segment). Also, the report compares profitability and efficiency ratio of the largest player CMSS with the main player in the mortgage lending business - Hypotecni Banka to find out how market dominance translates into economies of scale and superior profitability.
The key highlights from 4Q2012 we discuss in this report are:
• The business remains under pressure in spite of its impressive profitability. ROE fell to 15.2% in 2012 and net profit dropped 6% yoy in 4Q
• Lending continues to fall and is losing to mortgages. In 4Q12, the annual decline deepened to 3.3% yoy
• 4Q12 confirmed a recovery in terms of the number of new contracts sold, while deposits grew by a seasonally strong 3.2% qoq
• ČMSS remains the leader, but Raiffeisen grabs most of the growth
This report focuses specifically on development in Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna in 4Q2012. The main conclusions are:
Market position
Similarly to Wüstenrot Hypoteční banka in mortgage lending, Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is a relatively little bank, with a 10.5% share of lending and 8.7% of building savings deposits as of the end of 2012.
Although the bank has been consistently building up its market position (and has gained 1-2% of the market in the last 6 years), it was the biggest loser on the loan market in 2012 (with market share falling by more than 50 bp), while the bank gained over 30 bp in deposits.
In 4Q, the bank lost 29 bp in terms of its loan market share, but gained 8 bp in its deposits market shareThe bank’s overall balance sheet momentum is mixed. One one hand, loan growth is being hammered by negative market development and Wüstenrot’s weakening market position (loan book down 3.4% qoq and 7.9% yoy in 4Q). On the other hand, deposits increased by a solid 2.5% qoq and 3.9% yoy in 4Q for exactly the opposite reasons.
Profitability
Partly because of its small size (and limited economies of scale and synergies with a would-be commercial bank on the Czech market) and its conservative approach (the bank has the best loan quality and provision coverage), the bank is traditionally the least profitable building savings bank on the market. In 2012, the bank achieved ROE of “only” 9.7%, compared to the 15.2% of the 5-building savings banks average.
When adjusted for surplus of capital (when ROE is adjusted to the building savings market average for each bank), Wüstenrot is clearly the least profitable building savings bank on the market:
As shown in the report, the negative momentum in loan growth is taking its toll on the profitability of the sector. As it is the smallest building savings bank on the market (with relatively the highest cost base), no wonder Wüstenrot’s profitability is being doubly hit.
Asset quality
With non-performing loans at only 2.04% of the total and provision coverage of nearly 68% of non-performing loans, Wüstenrot Stavební Spořitelna is now the building savings bank with the best loan quality.
Thanks partly to the above, no wonder the need to create more provisions is low. In 2012, the bank created less than CZK 2 mil of new provisions, or 0.1% of average loans, by far the smallest amount in the sector.
Cost-efficiency
Size matters and the lack of economies of scale is reflected in Wüstenrot’s low cost efficiency. In 2012, the bank’s operating costs accounted for 1.27% of average assets, nearly twice as much as the other savings banks.
Cost savings and loan book development are the two main things to watch for at Wüstenrot in the coming quarters, in our view.
This report analyses the building savings business in the Czech Republic for the 4Q2012. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the building savings (as well as mortgage lending segment). Also, the report compares profitability and efficiency ratio of the largest player CMSS with the main
Read more »This report analyses the building savings business in the Czech Republic for the 4Q2012. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth, market share, margin and asset quality development in the building savings (as well as mortgage lending segment). Also, the report compares profitability and efficiency ratio of the largest player CMSS with the main player in the mortgage lending business - Hypotecni Banka to find out how market dominance translates into economies of scale and superior profitability.
The key highlights from 4Q2012 we discuss in this report are:
• The business remains under pressure in spite of its impressive profitability. ROE fell to 15.2% in 2012 and net profit dropped 6% yoy in 4Q
• Lending continues to fall and is losing to mortgages. In 4Q12, the annual decline deepened to 3.3% yoy
• 4Q12 confirmed a recovery in terms of the number of new contracts sold, while deposits grew by a seasonally strong 3.2% qoq
• ČMSS remains the leader, but Raiffeisen grabs most of the growth
This report analyses the housing lending in the Czech Republic for the 4Q2012. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth (for both, the mortgage as well as Building Society lending), market share, margin and asset quality development in the mortgage segment. Also, based on the example of Hypotecni Banka, we calculate profitability of the mortgage
Read more »This report analyses the housing lending in the Czech Republic for the 4Q2012. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth (for both, the mortgage as well as Building Society lending), market share, margin and asset quality development in the mortgage segment. Also, based on the example of Hypotecni Banka, we calculate profitability of the mortgage business for each bank.
This report focuses specifically on development in Wuestenrot Hypotecni Banka in the 4Q2012. The key highlights are:
Mortgage loans represented nearly 30% of all bank loans in 4Q12. The mortgage business generates around 15% of banks’ profits.
Wüstenrot continues to build its market share...
Wüstenrot’s mortgage loans increased by an impressive 4.7% qoq and over 10% yoy for the full year. On the other hand, Wüstenrot’s building society lending has dropped nearly 8% yoy, the most among the five building societies:
... but from a very low starting-point
Although Wüstenrot has been growing more than twice as fast as the overall market over the last five years, its late arrival in the mortgage business a decade ago means the bank still occupies only 2.5% of the market. While not bad as such (the bank held only 1.5% of the market in 2009), it remains well below the share the bank holds in the building society business (10.5%) and represents only a tenth of the figure for the other only pure mortgage player on the market – Hypoteční Banka.
The slowdown of the overall market growth (from 20-30% a year to 6% now) also makes it more difficult for Wüstenrot to catch up with the bigger players.
In 4Q, the bank sold 3.4% of the new production and held 4% of the net increase in the mortgage loan stock. This is a respectable achievement, though somewhat lower than in the previous quarters. In 2011, the bank was selling 5-6% of the new loans, for example:
Lack of scale hurts profitability
The relatively small market share and a lack of scale as a result make the biggest (though not the only one, obviously) difference when compared to Hypoteční Banka, in our view.
While interest margin and asset quality numbers seem comparable between the two banks, the cost side makes the biggest difference in our view:
As a result, Wüstenrot achieves ROE in single-digit territory, while Hypoteční banka has been enjoying profitability implying ROE of over 30% (when adjusted for its hefty overcapitalisation)
Based on a comparison of 22 banks in the Czech Republic in 2017, Ceska Sporitelna had the most employees, followed by CSOB and Komercni Banka.
Ceska Sporitelna employed 10,171 persons in 2017, down 1.24% when compared to the previous
Read more »Based on a comparison of 22 banks in the Czech Republic in 2017, Ceska Sporitelna had the most employees, followed by CSOB and Komercni Banka.
Ceska Sporitelna employed 10,171 persons in 2017, down 1.24% when compared to the previous year. Historically, the bank's workforce hit an all time high of 14,131 persons in 2000 and an all time low of 10,171 in 2017.
Average cost reached CZK 75,574 per month per month per employee, 1.87% more than a year ago. This figure was CZK 64,917 per month some 10 years ago.
Comparing Ceska Sporitelna with its closest peers, CSOB had 8,615 employees with average cost of CZK 76,610 per month per person, Komercni Banka operated with 8,492 people (and CZK 71,845 per month per employee) and MONETA Money Bank had 3,312 employees in 2017 with cost CZK 3,312 per month per head.
Czech banking sector employed 41,566 people in 2017.
You can see all the banks employees data on the Employees indicator page or you can download a report on the Czech banks in the report section.
Based on a comparison of 22 banks in the Czech Republic in 2016, Ceska Sporitelna had the most employees, followed by CSOB and Komercni Banka.
Ceska Sporitelna employed 10,299 persons in 2016, down 1.92% when compared to the previous
Read more »Based on a comparison of 22 banks in the Czech Republic in 2016, Ceska Sporitelna had the most employees, followed by CSOB and Komercni Banka.
Ceska Sporitelna employed 10,299 persons in 2016, down 1.92% when compared to the previous year. Historically, the bank's workforce hit an all time high of 14,131 persons in 2000 and an all time low of 10,299 in 2016.
Average cost reached CZK 74,190 per month per month per employee, 6.19% more than a year ago. This figure was CZK 59,483 per month some 10 years ago.
Comparing Ceska Sporitelna with its closest peers, CSOB had 8,517 employees with average cost of CZK 73,481 per month per person, Komercni Banka operated with 8,458 people (and CZK 69,254 per month per employee) and UniCredit Czech Republic had 3,328 employees in 2016 with cost CZK 3,328 per month per head.
Czech banking sector employed 41,202 people in 2016.
You can see all the banks employees data on the Employees indicator page or you can download a report on the Czech banks in the report section.
Based on a comparison of 22 banks in the Czech Republic in 2018, Ceska Sporitelna had the most employees, followed by CSOB and Komercni Banka.
Ceska Sporitelna employed 10,115 persons in 2018, down 0.551% when compared to the previous
Read more »Based on a comparison of 22 banks in the Czech Republic in 2018, Ceska Sporitelna had the most employees, followed by CSOB and Komercni Banka.
Ceska Sporitelna employed 10,115 persons in 2018, down 0.551% when compared to the previous year. Historically, the bank's workforce hit an all time high of 14,131 persons in 2000 and an all time low of 10,115 in 2018.
Average cost reached CZK 78,703 per month per month per employee, 4.14% more than a year ago. This figure was CZK 60,554 per month some 10 years ago.
Comparing Ceska Sporitelna with its closest peers, CSOB had 8,623 employees with average cost of CZK 84,164 per month per person, Komercni Banka operated with 8,411 people (and CZK 77,536 per month per employee) and UniCredit Czech Republic had 3,251 employees in 2018 with cost CZK 3,251 per month per head.
Czech banking sector employed 41,864 people in 2018.
You can see all the banks employees data on the Employees indicator page or you can download a report on the Czech banks in the report section.
Based on a comparison of 22 banks in the Czech Republic in 2017, Moravsky Penezni Ustav had the highest share of bad loans, followed by J&T Banka and PPF Banka.
Moravsky Penezni Ustav's non-performing loans reached 26.4% of total loans
Read more »Based on a comparison of 22 banks in the Czech Republic in 2017, Moravsky Penezni Ustav had the highest share of bad loans, followed by J&T Banka and PPF Banka.
Moravsky Penezni Ustav's non-performing loans reached 26.4% of total loans at the end of 2017, up from 24.4% when compared to the previous year. Historically, the NPL ratio hit an all time high of 39.4% in 2015 and an all time low of 2.23% in 2008.
Provision coverage amounted to 10.7% at the end of 2017, up from 10.0% compared to a year earlier.
Comparing Moravsky Penezni Ustav with its closest peers, J&T Banka operated at the end of 2017 with NPL ratio of 10.7% and provision coverage of 39.3%, PPF Banka with 10.4% and 29.9% and Banka Creditas had 9.76% of bad loans covered with 17.6% by provisions at the end of 2017.
Non-performing loans of the whole Czechia’s banking sector amounted to 3.74% of total loans in 2017, down from 4.59% when compared to the last year.
You can see all the banks non-performing loans data on the NPLs (As % Of Loans) indicator page or you can download a report on the Czech banks in the report section.