This report analyses the housing lending in the Czech Republic for the 1Q2013. You will find all the necessary details regarding volume growth (for both, the mortgage as well as Building Society lending), market share, margin and asset quality development in the mortgage segment. Also, based on the example of Hypotecni Banka, we calculate profitability of the mortgage busines for each bank.
This report focuses specifically on development in Wüstenrot Hypoteční Banka. in the 1Q2013. The key highlights are:
Wüstenrot continues to build its market share...
Wüstenrot’s mortgage loans increased by a solid 3.3% qoq and 15.6% yoy in 1Q13. On the other hand, Wüstenrot’s building society lending has dropped nearly 10.5% yoy, the most among the five building societies:
... but from a very low starting-point
Although Wüstenrot has been growing more than twice as fast as the overall market over the last five years, its late arrival in the mortgage business a decade ago means the bank still occupies only 2.6% of the market. While not bad as such (the bank held only 1.5% of the market in 2009), it remains well below the share the bank holds in the building society business (10.5%) and represents only a tenth of the figure for the other only pure mortgage player on the market – Hypoteční Banka.
The slowdown of the overall market growth (from 20-30% a year to 6% now) also makes it more difficult for Wüstenrot to catch up with the bigger players.
In 1Q13, the bank sold 3.1% of the new production and held 3.8% of the net increase in the mortgage loan stock. This is a respectable achievement, though somewhat lower than in the previous quarters. In 2011, the bank was selling 5-6% of the new loans, for example.
Lack of scale hurts profitability
The relatively small market share and a lack of scale as a result make the biggest (though not the only one, obviously) difference when compared to Hypoteční Banka, in our view.
While interest margin and asset quality numbers seem comparable between the two banks, the cost side makes the biggest difference in our view:
Wüstenrot operates with a cost-to-income ratio of around 45-55%, compared to the less than 16% of Hypoteční Banka
Costs represent 0.4% of average assets at Hypoteční Banka, compared to 0.9% at Wüstenrot and 1.6% of the market, on average
As a result, Wüstenrot achieves ROE in single-digit territory, while Hypoteční banka has been enjoying profitability implying ROE of over 30% (when adjusted for its hefty overcapitalisation).