summary | Unit |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
Sales | CZK mil |
Gross Profit | CZK mil |
EBIT | CZK mil |
Net Profit | CZK mil |
ROE | % |
EBIT Margin | % |
Net Margin | % |
Employees |
1,774 | 1,890 | 1,552 | 3,213 | 3,940 | |||||||
-58.0 | 242 | 387 | 817 | 1,149 | |||||||
-413 | -91.3 | 109 | 402 | 675 | |||||||
-494 | -96.8 | 44.7 | 347 | 653 | |||||||
-6,329% | -46.0% | 6.57% | 39.6% | 47.4% | |||||||
-23.3% | -4.83% | 7.02% | 12.5% | 17.1% | |||||||
-27.9% | -5.12% | 2.88% | 10.8% | 16.6% | |||||||
562 | 617 | 559 | 726 | 807 |
Total Assets | CZK mil |
Non-Current Assets | CZK mil |
Current Assets | CZK mil |
Shareholders' Equity | CZK mil |
Liabilities | CZK mil |
Non-Current Liabilities | CZK mil |
Current Liabilities | CZK mil |
Net Debt/EBITDA | |
Net Debt/Equity | % |
Cost of Financing | % |
1,673 | 1,512 | 1,708 | 1,960 | 2,224 | |||||||
736 | 755 | 875 | 847 | 843 | |||||||
883 | 713 | 757 | 1,004 | 1,202 | |||||||
-238 | 659 | 703 | 1,051 | 1,704 | |||||||
1,911 | 853 | 1,005 | 909 | 520 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
1,910 | 853 | 1,004 | 909 | 518 | |||||||
-4.37 | -70.0 | 3.17 | 0.829 | -0.363 | |||||||
-609% | 89.7% | 87.7% | 39.5% | -16.6% | |||||||
... | 6.33% | 1.46% | 7.95% | 3.79% | -4.44% | ... | ... |
Total Cash From Operations | CZK mil |
Total Cash From Investing | CZK mil |
Total Cash From Financing | CZK mil |
Net Change In Cash | CZK mil |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
income statement | Unit |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
Sales | CZK mil |
Cost of Goods & Services | CZK mil |
Gross Profit | CZK mil |
Staff Cost | CZK mil |
Other Cost | CZK mil |
EBITDA | CZK mil |
Depreciation | CZK mil |
EBIT | CZK mil |
Financing Cost | CZK mil |
Extraordinary Cost | CZK mil |
Pre-Tax Profit | CZK mil |
Tax | CZK mil |
Minorities | CZK mil |
Net Profit | CZK mil |
1,774 | 1,890 | 1,552 | 3,213 | 3,940 | |||||||
1,832 | 1,648 | 1,166 | 2,396 | 2,792 | |||||||
-58.0 | 242 | 387 | 817 | 1,149 | |||||||
209 | 229 | 212 | 291 | 384 | |||||||
64.3 | 21.6 | -19.5 | 25.7 | -12.6 | |||||||
-331 | -8.44 | 194 | 500 | 778 | |||||||
81.2 | 82.9 | 85.5 | 98.4 | 103 | |||||||
-413 | -91.3 | 109 | 402 | 675 | |||||||
76.3 | 14.9 | 48.0 | 19.6 | -9.23 | |||||||
3.44 | 1.53 | 4.33 | 3.89 | -0.460 | |||||||
-492 | -108 | 56.6 | 378 | 685 | |||||||
0 | 10.9 | -11.9 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
-494 | -96.8 | 44.7 | 347 | 653 |
Total Revenue Growth | % |
Operating Cost Growth | % |
EBITDA Growth | % |
EBIT Growth | % |
Pre-Tax Profit Growth | % |
Net Profit Growth | % |
... | 17.1% | 6.58% | -17.9% | 107% | 22.7% | ||||||
... | 35.4% | -8.20% | -23.4% | 64.8% | 17.2% | ||||||
... | 24.2% | -97.5% | -2,405% | 157% | 55.5% | ||||||
... | 15.1% | -77.9% | -219% | 269% | 68.0% | ||||||
... | 39.8% | -78.1% | -153% | 568% | 81.0% | ||||||
... | 47.0% | -80.4% | -146% | 677% | 88.1% |
ROE | % |
ROCE | % |
Gross Margin | % |
EBITDA Margin | % |
EBIT Margin | % |
Net Margin | % |
Cost of Financing | % |
Net Debt/EBITDA |
-6,329% | -46.0% | 6.57% | 39.6% | 47.4% | |||||||
... | -39.8% | -7.78% | 3.59% | 25.7% | 47.4% | ||||||
-3.27% | 12.8% | 24.9% | 25.4% | 29.2% | |||||||
-18.7% | -0.446% | 12.5% | 15.6% | 19.7% | |||||||
-23.3% | -4.83% | 7.02% | 12.5% | 17.1% | |||||||
-27.9% | -5.12% | 2.88% | 10.8% | 16.6% | |||||||
... | 6.33% | 1.46% | 7.95% | 3.79% | -4.44% | ... | ... | ||||
-4.37 | -70.0 | 3.17 | 0.829 | -0.363 |
balance sheet | Unit |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
Non-Current Assets | CZK mil |
Property, Plant & Equipment | CZK mil |
Intangible Assets | CZK mil |
Goodwill | CZK mil |
Current Assets | CZK mil |
Inventories | CZK mil |
Receivables | CZK mil |
Cash & Cash Equivalents | CZK mil |
Total Assets | CZK mil |
Shareholders' Equity | CZK mil |
Of Which Minority Interest | CZK mil |
Liabilities | CZK mil |
Non-Current Liabilities | CZK mil |
Long-Term Debt | CZK mil |
Deferred Tax Liabilities | CZK mil |
Current Liabilities | CZK mil |
Short-Term Debt | CZK mil |
Trade Payables | CZK mil |
Provisions | CZK mil |
Equity And Liabilities | CZK mil |
736 | 755 | 875 | 847 | 843 | |||||||
727 | 753 | 873 | 845 | 841 | |||||||
0.801 | 0.388 | 0.577 | 1.23 | 1.92 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
883 | 713 | 757 | 1,004 | 1,202 | |||||||
370 | 386 | 394 | 359 | 360 | |||||||
512 | 249 | 298 | 609 | 554 | |||||||
0.208 | 0.195 | 0.347 | 0.700 | 282 | |||||||
1,673 | 1,512 | 1,708 | 1,960 | 2,224 | |||||||
-238 | 659 | 703 | 1,051 | 1,704 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
1,911 | 853 | 1,005 | 909 | 520 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
1,910 | 853 | 1,004 | 909 | 518 | |||||||
1,449 | 591 | 617 | 416 | 0 | |||||||
355 | 165 | 301 | 380 | 437 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.55 | |||||||
1,673 | 1,512 | 1,708 | 1,960 | 2,224 |
... | 4.54% | -9.62% | 13.0% | 14.8% | 13.5% | ||||||
... | -194% | -377% | 6.79% | 49.4% | 62.2% | ||||||
... | 50.4% | -59.3% | 4.51% | -32.8% | -168% | ||||||
... | 50.4% | -59.2% | 4.53% | -32.7% | -100% | ... | ... |
Total Debt | CZK mil |
Net Debt | CZK mil |
Working Capital | CZK mil |
Capital Employed | CZK mil |
Net Debt/Equity | % |
Cost of Financing | % |
1,449 | 591 | 617 | 416 | 0 | |||||||
1,449 | 591 | 617 | 415 | -282 | |||||||
528 | 470 | 391 | 588 | 477 | |||||||
1,263 | 1,225 | 1,266 | 1,435 | 1,320 | |||||||
-609% | 89.7% | 87.7% | 39.5% | -16.6% | |||||||
... | 6.33% | 1.46% | 7.95% | 3.79% | -4.44% | ... | ... |
cash flow | Unit |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
Net Profit | CZK mil |
Depreciation | CZK mil |
Non-Cash Items | CZK mil |
Change in Working Capital | CZK mil |
Total Cash From Operations | CZK mil |
Capital Expenditures | CZK mil |
Other Investments | CZK mil |
Total Cash From Investing | CZK mil |
Issuance Of Shares | CZK mil |
Issuance Of Debt | CZK mil |
Total Cash From Financing | CZK mil |
Net Change In Cash | CZK mil |
-494 | -96.8 | 44.7 | 347 | 653 | |||||||
81.2 | 82.9 | 85.5 | 98.4 | 103 | |||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Days Sales Outstanding | days |
Days Sales Of Inventory | days |
Days Payable Outstanding | days |
Cash Conversion Cycle | days |
Cash Earnings | CZK mil |
Free Cash Flow | CZK mil |
105 | 48.1 | 70.0 | 69.2 | 51.3 | |||||||
73.8 | 85.6 | 123 | 54.7 | 47.0 | |||||||
70.7 | 36.6 | 94.1 | 57.9 | 57.1 | |||||||
108 | 97.0 | 99.2 | 65.9 | 41.3 | |||||||
-413 | -13.9 | 130 | 446 | 756 | |||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
other data | Unit |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
ROA | % |
Gross Margin | % |
Employees | |
Cost Per Employee | USD per month |
Cost Per Employee (Local Currency) | CZK per month |
Staff Cost (As % Of Total Cost) | % |
Effective Tax Rate | % |
Capital Expenditures (As % of Sales) | % |
-30.2% | -6.08% | 2.78% | 18.9% | 31.2% | |||||||
-3.27% | 12.8% | 24.9% | 25.4% | 29.2% | |||||||
562 | 617 | 559 | 726 | 807 | |||||||
1,753 | 1,584 | 1,612 | 1,562 | 1,660 | |||||||
30,999 | 30,975 | 31,541 | 33,377 | 39,613 | |||||||
9.56% | 11.6% | 14.7% | 10.3% | 11.7% | |||||||
0% | -10.1% | -21.0% | 0% | 0% | |||||||
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
This Annual Statistical Dossier offers a comparison of 15 companies from Plastic Injection Molding Industry from 1992 to 2017 on an annual basis. The report can be downloaded as an Excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the company's balance sheet, income statement, cash flow and the main ratios related to the firm's business.
The
Read more »This Annual Statistical Dossier offers a comparison of 15 companies from Plastic Injection Molding Industry from 1992 to 2017 on an annual basis. The report can be downloaded as an Excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the company's balance sheet, income statement, cash flow and the main ratios related to the firm's business.
The file contains data of following companies:
If you are only interested in particular areas of the company's business, you can find and download specific indicators from the company's Corporate Profile, or specific charts from the company's Chart Section.
Download a sample excel file attached to see more details. On purchase, the hidden cells will be unlocked and all available data wll be visible.
This Annual Statistical Dossier offers a summary of Koito Czech's performance between 2006 and 2017 on an annual basis. The report can be downloaded as an Excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the company's balance sheet, income statement, cash flow and the main ratios related to the firm's business.
If you are only interested
Read more »This Annual Statistical Dossier offers a summary of Koito Czech's performance between 2006 and 2017 on an annual basis. The report can be downloaded as an Excel file.
You will find here the key numbers from the company's balance sheet, income statement, cash flow and the main ratios related to the firm's business.
If you are only interested in particular areas of the company's business, you can find and download specific indicators from the company's Corporate Profile, or specific charts from the company's Chart Section.
If you are interested in the company’s quarterly figures, please refer to the company’s Quarterly Statistical Dossier.
Based on a comparison of 15 firms among Plastic Injection Molding Industry, Bohm Plast-Technik had the biggest debt relative to its equity at the end of 2017 followed by BENET Automotive and Viscuma Plastic.
Bohm Plast-Technik net debt reached
Read more »Based on a comparison of 15 firms among Plastic Injection Molding Industry, Bohm Plast-Technik had the biggest debt relative to its equity at the end of 2017 followed by BENET Automotive and Viscuma Plastic.
Bohm Plast-Technik net debt reached CZK 90.8 mil. and accounted for 249% of equity at the end of 2017. The ratio is down 22.6% when compared to the previous year. Historically, the firm’s net debt to equity reached an all time high of 332% in 2016 and an all time low of -653% in 1993.
When compared to EBITDA, net debt amounted to -8.47x at the end of the year. The ratio reached an all time high of 28.5x in 1993 and an all time low of -22.1x in 2016.
Comparing Bohm Plast-Technik with its closest peers, BENET Automotive posted net debt to equity of 177% and 7.12x when compared to EBITDA at the end of 2017. Viscuma Plastic ended the year 2016 with a net debt at 123% of equity and 4.96x when compared to its EBITDA while Magna Exteriors Nymburk had net debt at 71.9% of equity and 3.20x to EBITDA at the end of the year.
You can see all the companies net debt/equity data on the Net Debt/Equity indicator page or you can download a special statistical dossier on the Plastic Injection Molding Industry in the reports section.
Based on a comparison of 15 firms among Plastic Injection Molding Industry, Automotive Lighting generated the highest earnings before interest cost, taxes and depreciation (so called EBITDA) in 2017 followed by Magna Exteriors Bohemia and Koito Czech.
Read more »Based on a comparison of 15 firms among Plastic Injection Molding Industry, Automotive Lighting generated the highest earnings before interest cost, taxes and depreciation (so called EBITDA) in 2017 followed by Magna Exteriors Bohemia and Koito Czech.
Automotive Lighting made EBITDA of CZK 2,168 mil, down 14.4% compared to the previous year. Historically, the firm’s EBITDA reached an all time high of CZK 2,531 mil in 2016 and an all time low of CZK 430 mil in 2000. The average profit in the last five years amounted to CZK 1,870 mil.
The company generated an average EBITDA margin of 12.7% for its shareholders in the last five years with a maximum of 13.9% and a minimum of 11.3%.
Comparing Automotive Lighting with its closest peers, Magna Exteriors Bohemia generated EBITDA of CZK 1,189 mil with a EBITDA margin of 10.6% in 2017, Koito Czech grossed CZK 733 mil (EBITDA margin of 14.4%) and Mahle Behr Ostrava announced a profit of CZK 638 mil translating into a margin of 11.7%.
You can see all the companies ebitda data on the EBITDA indicator page or you can download a special statistical dossier on the Plastic Injection Molding Industry in the reports section.
Based on a comparison of 15 firms among Plastic Injection Molding Industry, Isolit-Bravo generated the highest EBIIDA Margin in 2017 followed by Letoplast and Koito Czech.
Isolit-Bravo made EBITDA of CZK 242 mil, which translates into
Read more »Based on a comparison of 15 firms among Plastic Injection Molding Industry, Isolit-Bravo generated the highest EBIIDA Margin in 2017 followed by Letoplast and Koito Czech.
Isolit-Bravo made EBITDA of CZK 242 mil, which translates into EBITDA margin of 22.8%. Historically, the firm’s margin reached an all time high of 22.8% in 2017 and an all time low of 11.6% in 2014. The average EBITDA margin in the last five years amounted to 17.5%.
Comparing Isolit-Bravo with its closest peers, Letoplast generated EBITDA of CZK 76.3 mil with a EBITDA margin of 14.6% in 2017, Koito Czech grossed CZK 733 mil (EBITDA margin of 14.4%) and Formplast Purkert announced a profit of CZK 156 mil translating into a margin of 14.2%.
You can see all the companies ebitda margin data on the EBITDA Margin indicator page or you can download a special statistical dossier on the Plastic Injection Molding Industry in the reports section.
Based on a comparison of 15 firms among Plastic Injection Molding Industry, Automotive Lighting generated the highest sales in 2017 followed by Magna Exteriors Bohemia and Mahle Behr Mnichovo Hradiste.
Automotive Lighting made total sales of
Read more »Based on a comparison of 15 firms among Plastic Injection Molding Industry, Automotive Lighting generated the highest sales in 2017 followed by Magna Exteriors Bohemia and Mahle Behr Mnichovo Hradiste.
Automotive Lighting made total sales of CZK 16,162 mil, down 11.0% compared to the previous year. Historically, the firm’s revenues an all time high of CZK 18,169 mil in 2016 and an all time low of CZK 4,715 mil in 2009.
The average sales growth in the last five years amounted to 17.7%.
Comparing Automotive Lighting with its closest peers, Magna Exteriors Bohemia generated a sales of CZK 11,200 mil average sales growth 10.6% in 2017, Mahle Behr Mnichovo Hradiste sold products and services worth CZK 7,590 mil (5-year growth of 4.08%) and Mahle Behr Ostrava announced revenues of CZK 5,453 mil translating into average nominal growth of 4.08% in the last five years.
You can see all the companies sales data on the Sales indicator page or you can download a special statistical dossier on the Plastic Injection Molding Industry in the reports section.